Your Organization Is Alive. Is It Well?

Your organization is a living system.

It breathes through its people.

Moves through its routines.

Learns—or forgets—through its culture.

And like any living system, it can get… unwell.

Not broken.

Not failing.

Just tired.

Disconnected.

Stuck.

Over the next several weeks, I’ll be sharing a series I’ve been working on behind the scenes:

Organizational Diseases—and the Path to Thriving.

Each one reflects a pattern I see again and again in good organizations struggling to stay healthy.

Not dysfunction. Not drama.

Just systems asking for attention.

Here are the six I’ll explore:

1. Reactive Survival Response (Governance under stress)

2. Systemic Burnout (Cultures running on empty)

3. Organizational Dysmorphia (Growth that distorts identity)

4. Status Quo Addiction (Strategic stagnation)

5. Sector Isolation (Working in silos, solving alone)

6. Pipeline Atrophy (Underdeveloped leadership and continuity)

 

You might wonder: Why start with governance?

Because in many systems, burnout and drift are symptoms.

Governance is often where the breakdown begins.

When governance enters a reactive stress response—fight, flight, or freeze—

the whole system starts to lose rhythm, clarity, and alignment.

So we begin there.

And then we’ll move through culture, growth, strategy, relationships, and capacity.

Thriving isn’t a perk.

It’s not accidental.

It’s something we design for—intentionally, and over time.

First up: Reactive Governance—What It Is and What It Costs.

Chris McNiven

Dr. Chris McNiven is the Founder and Opportunity Architect of Aspire Consulting Partners, Inc., where he leads initiatives to help organizations align their purpose, people, and performance. With over 20 years of experience, he has guided numerous organizations through alignment, change, and innovation processes, resulting in comprehensive growth across financial, people, mission, quality, and customer dimensions.

Previous
Previous

Ready, Not Reactive: Practices That Make Governance Work

Next
Next

Ready, Not Reactive: A Governance Self-Check for Boards in Motion